{"id":28,"date":"2023-03-03T16:21:24","date_gmt":"2023-03-03T16:21:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/?page_id=28"},"modified":"2023-03-03T16:21:24","modified_gmt":"2023-03-03T16:21:24","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Caso, A.,<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2021). Executive Functions in Aging: An Experimental and Computational Study of the Wisconsin Card Sorting and Brixton Spatial Anticipation Tests. <em>Experimental Aging Research.<\/em> (37 pages.) <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0361073X.2021.1932202\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0361073X.2021.1932202<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2021). Action production and event perception as routine sequential behaviors. <em>Topics in Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>13<\/em>(1), 63-78. &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tops.12462\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tops.12462<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2020<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Buyakin, E. V.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2020). Automatic and Controlled Sentence Production: A Computational Model. In S. Denison et al. (eds.) <em>Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em> (pp. 1961-1966). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Toronto, Canada.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Caso, A.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2020). A neurally plausible schema-theoretic approach to modelling cognitive dysfunction and neurophysiological markers in Parkinson&#8217;s Disease. <em>Neuropsychologia<\/em>, <em>140<\/em>, 107359. (19 pages.) <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107359\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107359<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Guest, O.<\/strong>, <strong>Caso, A. <\/strong>&amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2020). On Simulating Neural Damage in Connectionist Networks. <em>Computational Brain &amp; Behavior<\/em>, <em>3<\/em>, 289-321. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42113-020-00081-z\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42113-020-00081-z<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cracco, E.,<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2019). Automatic Imitation of Multiple Agents: A Computational Model. <em>Cognitive Psychology<\/em>, <em>113<\/em>(101224), 1-20. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2019.101224<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Yuan, W.<\/strong>, Lin, F., &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2019). Relevance theory, pragmatic inference and cognitive architecture. <em>Philosophical Psychology<\/em>, <em>32<\/em>(1), 98-122. DOI: 10.1080\/09515089.2018.1497788<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2018<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, Byde, C., De Cecilio, R., Fulks, C. &amp; Morais, D. S. (2018). Set-shifting and place-keeping as separable control processes. <em>Cognitive Psychology<\/em>, <em>105<\/em>, 53-80. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2018.07.001<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Peebles, D. (2018). On the relation between Marr\u2019s levels: A response to Blokpoel (2017). <em>Topics in Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>10<\/em>(3), 649-653. DOI: 10.1111\/tops.12283<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2017<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Caso, A. <\/strong>&amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2017). A Neurocomputational Model of Learning to Select Actions. In Van Vugt, M., Banks, A., &amp; Kennedy, W. (eds.) <em>Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Caso, A.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2017). A Model of Cognitive Control in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Integrating Schema Theory and Basal Ganglia Function. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, &amp; E. J. Davelaar (Eds.). <em>Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. pp. 210-215.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2017). Deep-learning networks and the functional architecture of executive control. <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences<\/em>, <em>40<\/em>, 33, e261.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sexton, N. J<\/strong>. &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2017). Task inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach. <em>Cognitive Psychology<\/em>, <em>94<\/em>, 1-25. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2016<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Blakeman, S. <\/strong>&amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2016) Narrowing of the Cone-of-Direct Gaze Through Reinforcement Learning. <em>Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.<\/em> London, UK.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2016). Executive functions and the generation of \u201crandom\u201d sequential responses: A computational account. <em>Journal of Mathematical Psychology<\/em>, <em>73<\/em>, 153-168. DOI: 10.1016\/j.jmp.2016.06.002<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2016). Schema theory and neuropsychology. In M. A. Arbib and J. J. Bonaiuto (eds.) <em>From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience<\/em>. (Chapter 14, pp. 433-456.) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>&amp; Marsh, V. (2016). Set-shifting as a component process of goal-directed problem-solving. <em>Psychological Research<\/em>, <em>80<\/em>(2), 307-323. DOI: 10.1007\/s00426-015-0652-2<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> &amp; French, R. M. (2016) TRACX2: A connectionist autoencoder using graded chunks to model infant visual statistical learning. <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, <\/em>372, 20160057.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Peebles, D. (2015). Beyond single-level accounts: The role of cognitive architectures in cognitive scientific explanation. <em>Topics in Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>7<\/em>, 243-258. DOI: 10.1111\/tops.12132<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Fautrellle, L., <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, French, R. M., <strong>Addyman, C.<\/strong> &amp; Thomas, E. (2015) Motor activity improves temporal accuracy. <em>PloS ONE, 10(3): e0119187. DOI: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0119187<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mitsopoulos, C.<\/strong>, <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2015) Model-based analysis of the Tower of London task, <em>Proceedings of the 2nd Multi-disciplinary Conference in Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making<\/em>. Edmonton, AL, Canada.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nardini, M, Bales, J. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2015). Integration of audio-visual information for spatial decisions in children and adults. <em>Developmental Science, <\/em><em>DOI: <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1111\/desc.12327\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">10.1111\/desc.12327<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sexton, N. J.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2015). Task-set inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A computational model of task switching. In R. Dale et al. (eds.) <em>Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em> (pp. 2134-2139). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Pasadena, CA.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2014<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Addyman, C.<\/strong> &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2014) GAMIT-Net:&nbsp;Retrospective and prospective interval timing in a single neural network.<em>Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.<\/em>&nbsp;Quebec City, PQ, Canada.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Guest, O.<\/strong>, (2014). Implementations are not specifications: Specification, replication and experimentation in computational cognitive modeling. <em>Cognitive Systems Research<\/em>, <em>27<\/em>, 42-49. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cogsys.2013.05.001<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P., Ruh, N., &amp; Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2014). The Goal Circuit Model: A hierarchical multi-route model of the acquisition and control of routine sequential action in humans. <em>Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>38<\/em>, 244-274. DOI: 10.1111\/cogs.12067<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>French, R. M., <strong>Addyman, C.<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D<\/strong>. &amp; Thomas, E (2014)&nbsp;Unifying prospective and retrospective interval-time estimation: A fading-Gaussian activation-based model of interval-timing.&nbsp;<em>Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 126<\/em>, 141-150.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>French, R.M.,&nbsp;<strong>Addyman,&nbsp;C.<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;&amp; Thomas, E. (2014) GAMIT: A Fading-Gaussian Activation Model of Interval-Time&nbsp; \u2014 Unifying prospective and retrospective time estimation&nbsp;<em>Timing &amp; Time Perception Reviews, 1. DOI:&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1163\/24054496-00101002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">10.1163\/24054496-00101002<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Guest, O.<\/strong>, <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; Davelaar, E., J. (2014). The influence of implementation on \u201chub\u201d models of semantic cognition. In Mayor, J. &amp; Gomez, P. (Eds.), <em>Computational Models of Cognitive Processes.<\/em> (pp. 155-169). World Scientific, Singapore.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Papera, M., <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; Richards, A. (2014). Artificially created stimuli produced by a genetic algorithm using a saliency model as its fitness function show that Inattentional Blindness modulates performance in a pop-out visual search paradigm. <em>Vision Research<\/em>, <em>97<\/em>, 31-44. DOI: 10.1016\/j.visres.2014.01.013&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sexton, N. J.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2014). An architecturally constrained model of random number generation and its application to modelling the effect of generation rate. <em>Frontiers in Psychology<\/em>, <em>5<\/em>(160), 1-14. DOI: 10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00670<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Addyman, C. &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2013) Local redundancy governs infants\u2019 spontaneous orienting to visual-temporal sequences.&nbsp;<em>Child Development<\/em>,<em>&nbsp;84<\/em>, 1137-1144.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Althaus, N. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2013) Modeling cross-modal interactions in early word learning.&nbsp;<em>IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5,<\/em>&nbsp;288-297<em>.<\/em>&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2013). Action slips. In Pashler, H. (Ed.), <em>Encyclopedia of the Mind<\/em> (pp. 1758-1760). Sage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, Catmur, C. &amp; Heyes, C. M. (2013). Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes? <em>Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>37<\/em>(4), 605-630. DOI: 10.1111\/j.1551-6709.2012.01252.x<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, Cook, R., Dickinson, A., &amp; Heyes, C.M. (2013). Associative (not Hebbian) learning and the mirror neuron system. <em>Neuroscience Letters<\/em>, <em>540<\/em>, 28-36. DOI: 10.1016\/j.neulet.2012.10.002<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Fox, J., <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; Glasspool, D. W. (2013). A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making. <em>Frontiers in Psychology<\/em>, <em>4<\/em>(150), 1-19. DOI: 10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00150<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Shallice, T., &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2013). Is there a semantic system for abstract words? <em>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience<\/em>, <em>7<\/em>(175), 1-10. DOI: 10.3389\/fnhum.201300175<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sood, M.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2013). Modelling the Supervisory System and Frontal Dysfunction: An Architecturally Grounded Model of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, &amp; I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), <em>Proceedings of the&nbsp;35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em> (pp. 1354-1359). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Berlin, Germany.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Westermann, G. &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2013) From perceptual to language-mediated categorization.&nbsp;<em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369<\/em>: 201220391<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2012<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Thomas, M. S. C., Purser, H. R. M. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2012) Is the mystery of thought demystified by context-dependent categorisation? Towards a new relation between language and thought.&nbsp;<em>Mind and Language, 27<\/em>, 595-618.&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Althaus, N. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2012)&nbsp;Using saliency maps to separate competing processes in infant visual cognition.&nbsp;<em>Child Development, 83<\/em>, 1122-1128.&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Davelaar, E. J. (2012). Modelling correlations in \u201cresponse inhibition\u201d. In E. J. Davelaar (Ed.), <em>Connectionist Models of Neurocognition and Emergent Behaviour<\/em> (pp. 245-258). World Scientific, Singapore.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, Wutke, K. &amp; Davelaar, E. (2012). Differential contributions of task-shifting and memory updating to dual task interference. <em>Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology<\/em>, <em>65<\/em>(3), 587-612. DOI: 10.1080\/17470218.2011.629053<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2012). Learning action affordances and action schemas. In Seel, N. (Ed.), <em>Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning<\/em> (pp. 1758-1760). Springer, Berlin.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Guest, O.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2012). Semantic cognition: A re-examination of the recurrent&nbsp;network \u201chub\u201d model. In Ru\u00dfwinkel, N., Drewitz, U., &amp; van Rijn, H. (Eds.),&nbsp;<em>Proceedings of the 11th International&nbsp;Conference on Cognitive Modeling<\/em>&nbsp;(pp. 259-264).&nbsp;Technische Universit\u00e4t Berlin, Berlin.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Purser, H., Thomas, M.S.C., Tomlinson, S. &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2012) Are imaging and lesioning convergent methods for assessing functional specialisation? Investigations using an artificial neural network.&nbsp;<em>Brain and Cognition, 78<\/em>, 38-49.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Shallice, T. &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2012). The Organisation of Mind: Response to commentators. Cortex, 48, 1383-1387. DOI: 10.1016\/j.cortex.2012.07.004<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2011<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Addyman, C.<\/strong>, French, R. M.,&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;&amp; Thomas, E. (2011). Learning to perceive time: A connectionist, memory-decay model of the development of interval timing in infants In&nbsp;<em>Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.&nbsp;<\/em>Boston, MA: USA.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2011). Cognitive control in the generation of random sequences: A computational study of secondary task effects. In Hoelscher, C., Shipley, T.F., and Carlson, L. (Eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em> (pp. 2168-2173). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Boston, MA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2011). Complementary perspectives on cognitive control. <em>Topics in Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>3<\/em>(2), 208-211. DOI: 10.1111\/j.756-8765.2011.01145.x<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Shallice, T. (2011). The roles of functional neuroimaging and cognitive neuropsychology in the development of cognitive theory: A reply to Coltheart. <em>Cognitive Neuropsychology<\/em>, <em>28<\/em>(6), 403-413.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>French, R. M., <strong>Addyman, C.<\/strong> &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2011): TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction.&nbsp;<em>Psychological Review, 118,<\/em>&nbsp;614-636.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2010<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2010): Cognitive control: Componential or emergent? <em>Topics in Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>2<\/em>, 598-613.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Davelaar, E. J. (2010): <em>Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: A simulation approach<\/em>. In Salvucci, D. &amp; Gunzelmann, G. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 10<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference of Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. pp. 31-36. Drexel University: Philadelphia, PA, USA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Davelaar, E. J. &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2010): <em>Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: An analytic approach<\/em>. In Catrambone, R. &amp; Ohlsson, S. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 32<sup>nd<\/sup> Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. pp. 937-942. Cognitive Science Society Incorporated: Portland, OR, USA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2010) Computational perspectives on cognitive development. <em>Wiley Interdisciplinary Review<\/em>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.,&nbsp;<\/strong>Quinn, P. C. &amp; Lea, S. E. G. (Eds.) (2010)&nbsp;<em>The making of human concepts<\/em>. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2010): Action selection in complex routinized sequential behaviors. <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, <em>36<\/em>, 955-975.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thomas, R., Nardini, M. &amp;&nbsp;<strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>&nbsp;(2010). Interactions between \u201clight-from-above\u201d and convexity priors in visual development.&nbsp;<em>Journal of Vision, 10(8<\/em>):<em>6,<\/em>&nbsp;1-7.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2009): Extending the contention scheduling model of routine action selection: The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task and frontal dysfunction. In Howes, A., Peebles, D., &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Manchester, UK. pp. 198-203. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Howes, A., Peebles, D., &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(eds.) (2009): <em>Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Manchester, UK.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D., Leech, R., &amp; Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2009): <em>Connectionist and Dynamic Systems models of development: The case of analogical completion<\/em>. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M. S. C., &amp; McClelland, J. L. (eds.), <em>Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Re-Considered<\/em>. pp. 203-217. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Purser, H., Thomas, M. S. C., &amp; Snoxall, S. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2009) The development of similarity: Testing the prediction of a computational model of metaphor comprehension. <em>Language and Cognitive Processes<\/em>, 24, 1406-1430.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2008<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Leech, R., Mareschal, D., &amp; Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2008): Analogy as Relational Priming: A Developmental and Computational Perspective on the Origins of a Complex Cognitive Skill. <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences<\/em>, <em>31<\/em>, 357-378.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Leech, R., Mareschal, D., &amp; Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2008): Response to commentators: Growing cognition from recycled parts. <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences<\/em>, <em>31<\/em>, 401-414.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D<\/strong>. (2008): The hierarchies and systems that underlie routine behavior: evidence from an experiment in virtual gardening. In Sloutsky, V., Love, B., &amp; McRae, K. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. Washington, DC. pp. 339-344. July.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2008): <em>A connectionist approach to modelling the flexible control of routine activities<\/em>. In French, R. M. &amp; Thomas, E. (eds.), <em>From Rules to Associations: Connectionist Models of Behaviour and Cognition<\/em>. pp. 3-15. World Scientific: Singapore. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldscibooks.com\/lifesci\/6791.html\">PDF<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldscibooks.com\/lifesci\/6791.html\"><\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sirois, S.,<\/strong> Spratling, M.W., Thomas, M.S.C.,&nbsp;<strong>Westermann, G., Mareschal, D.,<\/strong> and Johnson, M.H. (2008) Precis of Neuroconstructivism: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences<\/em> 31, 321-356<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Baughman, F. D. &amp; Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2007): <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogsys.2007.06.004\">Inhibition and young children&#8217;s performance on the Tower of London task<\/a>. <em>Cognitive Systems Research<\/em>, <em>8<\/em>, 216-226.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2007): <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/15326900701326592\">The role of falsification in the development of cognitive architectures: Insights from a Lakatosian analysis<\/a>. <em>Cognitive Science<\/em>, <em>31<\/em>, 509-533.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2007): <em>Integrating Cognitive Systems: The COGENT Approach<\/em>. In Gray, W. D. (eds.), <em>Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems<\/em>. pp. 414-427. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2007): Tool Use and Related Errors in Ideational Apraxia: The Quantitative Simulation of Patient Error Profiles. <em>Cortex<\/em>, <em>43<\/em>, 319-337.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Grecucci, A., <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; Rumiati, R. I. (2007): <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogsys.2007.05.001\">A computational model of action resonance and its modulation by emotional stimulation<\/a>. <em>Cognitive Systems Research<\/em>, <em>8<\/em>, 143-160.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Leech, R., Mareschal, D., &amp; Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2007): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.informaworld.com\/index\/780454509.pdf\">Relations as Transformations: Implications for Analogical Reasoning<\/a>. <em>Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology<\/em>, <em>60<\/em>, 897-908.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D., Sirois, S., &amp; Westermann, G. <\/strong>(2007). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oup.com\/uk\/catalogue\/?ci=9780198529934\"><em>Neuroconstructivism, Vol. II: <\/em><em>Perspectives and Prospects<\/em>.<\/a> Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> &amp; Thomas, M.S.C. (2007). Computational modeling in developmental psychology. <em>IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (Special Issue on Autonomous Mental Development)<\/em> 11, 137-150.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, Thomas, M. &amp; <strong>Westermann, G. <\/strong>(2007). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oup.com\/uk\/catalogue\/?ci=9780198529903\"><em>Neuroconstructivism, Vol. I: How the brain constructs cognition.<\/em><\/a> Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Westermann, G., Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, Johnson, M.H., <strong>Sirois, S.<\/strong>, Spratling, M.W. &amp; Thomas, M.S.C. (2007). Neuroconstructivism. <em>Developmental Science<\/em> 10, 75-83.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2006<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Baughman, F. D. &amp; Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2006): Inhibition and young children&#8217;s performance on the Tower of London task. In <em>Proceedings of the 7<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Trieste, Italy. pp. 26-31. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2006): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.informaworld.com\/index\/743786466.pdf\">Cognitive Architectures as Lakatosian Research Programmes: Two case studies<\/a>. <em>Philosophical Psychology<\/em>, <em>19<\/em>, 199-220.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> &amp; Shallice, T. (2006): Structured representations in the control of behavior cannot be so easily dismissed: A reply to Botvinick and Plaut (2006). <em>Psychological Review<\/em>, <em>113<\/em>, 929-931.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>&amp; Shallice, T. (2006): Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behaviour. <em>Psychological Review<\/em>, <em>113<\/em>, 887-916.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Crescentini, C., Shallice, T., &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2006): A macroplanning model to simulate dynamic aphasia. In <em>Proceedings of the 7<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Trieste, Italy. pp. 80-85. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Grecucci, A., <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, &amp; Rumiati, R. I. (2006): The emotional enhancement of stimulus-response compatibility: A computational study. In <em>Proceedings of the 7<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Trieste, Italy. pp. 118-123. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2006): Redundancy and multiple levels of control in a connectionist model of sequential action. In <em>Proceedings of the 7<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Trieste, Italy. pp. 262-267. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Westermann, G.<\/strong>, <strong>Sirois, S.<\/strong>, Shultz, T.R. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2006). Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience. <em>Trends in Cognitive Sciences<\/em> 10, 227-232.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2005<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2005): <em>The control of routine action: Modelling normal and impaired functioning<\/em>. In Houghton, G. (eds.), <em>Connectionist models in Cognitive Psychology<\/em>. pp. 313-344. Psychology Press: Hove, UK.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, Schwartz, M. F., <strong>Yule, P.<\/strong>, &amp; Shallice, T. (2005): The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living. <em>Cognitive Neuropsychology<\/em>, <em>22<\/em>, 959-1004.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2005): Routine action: Combining familiarity and goal orientedness. In Bryson, J. J., Prescott, T. J., &amp; Seth, A. K. (eds.), <em>Modelling Natural Action Selection<\/em>. Edinburgh. pp. 174-179.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2005): The time course of routine action. In Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L., &amp; Bucciarelli, M. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. Stresa, Italy. pp. 1889-1894. July.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., &amp; Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2005): A reinforcement model of sequential routine action. In Honkela, T., K\u00f6h\u00f6nen, V., P\u00f6ll\u00e4, M., &amp; Simula, O. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning<\/em>. Espoo, Finland. pp. 65-70. June.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Westermann, G. &amp; Mareschal, D<\/strong><strong>. <\/strong>(2005). Connectionist modelling. In Hopkins, B., Barr, R. G., Michel, G. F., &amp; Rochat, P. (Eds.) <em>Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Child Development.<\/em> 305-308. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2004<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Leech, R. &amp; Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2004): Connectionist modelling of the development of analogical completion. <em>AISB Quarterly Newsletter<\/em>, <em>18<\/em>, 4-5.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Leech, R., Mareschal, D., &amp; Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>(2004): <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldscibooks.com\/compsci\/5508.html\"><em>A temporal attractor framework for the development of analogical completion<\/em><\/a>. In Bowman, H. &amp; Labiouse, C. (eds.), <em>Connectionist Models of Cognition and Perception II<\/em>. pp. 201-210. World Scientific: Singapore.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sirois, S. &amp; Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2004): An interacting systems model of infant habituation. <em>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience<\/em> 16, 1352-1362.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Westermann, G. &amp;, Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2004): Modelling asymmetric infant categorization with the representational acuity hypothesis. In Howe, P. &amp; Labouise, C. (Eds.) <em>Connectionist models of cognition and perception II: Proceedings of the Eighth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW8).<\/em> 95-104. London, UK: World Scientific.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2003): Organisation and disorganisation of complex sequential activities. In Detje, F., D\u00f6rner, D., &amp; Schaub, H. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Bamberg, Deutschland. pp. 51-56. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2003): Mechanisms for the generation and regulation of sequential behaviour. <em>Philosophical Psychology<\/em>, <em>16<\/em>, 389-416.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. &amp; Yule, P.<\/strong> (2003): An introduction to the COGENT cognitive modelling environment. In Detje, F., D\u00f6rner, D., &amp; Schaub, H. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Bamberg, Deutschland. pp. 315. April.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong>, <strong>Yule, P.<\/strong>, &amp; Fox, J. (2003): Cue selection and category learning: A systematic comparison of three theories. <em>Cognitive Science Quarterly<\/em>, <em>3<\/em>, 143-182.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Leech, R.<\/strong>, <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2003): A connectionist account of analogical development. In Alterman, R. &amp; Kirsh, D. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. Boston, MA. pp. 710-715. August.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2003). Connectionist models of learning and development in infancy. In Quinlan, P. (Ed.), <em>Connectionist Models of Development<\/em>. 43-82. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2003). Computational Models of Cognitive Development. In Nadel, L. (Ed.), <em>Encyclopaedia of Cognitive Science.<\/em> 533-39.&nbsp; London, UK: Macmillan.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Yule, P.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2003): Express: A web-based technology to support human and computational experimentation. <em>Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &amp; Computers<\/em>, <em>35<\/em>, 605-613.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2002<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2002): Two closely related simulations provide weak limits on Residual Normality. <em>Behavioral and Brain Sciences<\/em>, <em>25<\/em>, 754-755.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2002): Order and disorder in everyday action: The roles of contention scheduling and supervisory attention. <em>Neurocase<\/em>, <em>8<\/em>, 61-79.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2002): Control and communication in mental computation. <em>Computational Intelligence<\/em>, <em>18<\/em>, 29-31.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2002): <em>Modelling High-Level Cognitive Processes<\/em>. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>French, R. M., Mermillod, M., Chauvin, A., Quinn, P.C., &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2002).&nbsp; The importance of starting blurry: Simulating improved basic-level category learning in infants due to weak visual acuity. In <em>Proceedings of the twenty -fourth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. London: LEA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2002). Connectionist methods in infancy research. In Fagen, J. &amp; Hayne, H. (Eds.), <em>Progress in Infancy Research, Vol. 2.<\/em> 71-119. Erlbaum. (Formerly <em>Advances in Infancy Research<\/em>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> &amp; Johnson, S. P. (2002) Learning to perceive object unity: A connectionist account. <em>Developmental Science<\/em> 5, 151-172.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sirois, S.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2002) Models of infant habituation. <em>Trends in Cognitive Sciences<\/em> 6, 293-98.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Sirois, S.<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2002). Infant habituation: a review of current computational models and a new proposal.&nbsp; In Bullinaria, J. (Ed.), <em>Proceedings of the Seventh Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW7).<\/em> 51-63. London, UK: World Scientific Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2001<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2001): The role of object-oriented concepts in cognitive models. <em>Trends in Cognitive Sciences<\/em>, <em>5<\/em>, 333.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>&amp; Glasspool, D. W. (2001): <em>Learning action affordances and action schemas<\/em>. In French, R. M. &amp; Sougn\u00e9, J. (eds.), <em>Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution<\/em>. pp. 133-142. Springer-Verlag: London.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>French, R. M., Mermillod, M., Quinn, P.C., <strong>Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2001). Reversing category exclusivities in infant perceptual categorisation: Simulation and data. In J. D. Moore &amp; K. Stenning (Eds), <em>Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.<\/em> 307-312. London: LEA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Schafer, G. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D. <\/strong>(2001). Modeling infant speech sound discrimination using simple associative networks. <em>Infancy<\/em> 2, 7-28.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thomas, M. S. C. &amp; <strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2001) Metaphor as categorisation: A connectionist implementation. <em>Metaphor and Symbol<\/em> 16, 5-27.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thomas, M. S. C.,<strong> Mareschal, D., <\/strong>&amp; Hinds, A. C. (2001), A connectionist account of the emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. In <em>Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society<\/em>. 1042-1047. London: LEA.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Yule, P. <\/strong>&amp; <strong>Cooper, R. P.<\/strong> (2001): Towards a technology for computational experimentation. In Altmann, E., Cleeremans, A., Schunn, C. D., &amp; Gray, W. D. (eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 4<sup>th<\/sup> International Conference on Cognitive Modelling<\/em>. Fairfax, VA. pp. 223-228. July.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2000<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Cooper, R. P. <\/strong>&amp; Shallice, T. (2000): Contention Scheduling and the control of routine activities. <em>Cognitive Neuropsychology<\/em>, <em>17<\/em>, 297-338. <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/026432900380427\">PDF<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1080\/026432900380427\"><\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong> (2000). Connectionist modelling and infant development. In Muir, D. and Slater, A.M. (Eds). <em>Essential Readings in Psychology: Infant Development.<\/em> 55-65. Oxford and Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mareschal, D.<\/strong>, French, R. M., Quinn, P. (2000). A connectionist account of asymmetric category learning in infancy. <em>Developmental Psychology<\/em> 36, 635-645.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-28","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/author\/admin\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29,"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions\/29"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/psyc.bbk.ac.uk\/ccnl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}