Publications

2021

  • Caso, A., & Cooper, R. P. (2021). Executive Functions in Aging: An Experimental and Computational Study of the Wisconsin Card Sorting and Brixton Spatial Anticipation Tests. Experimental Aging Research. (37 pages.) https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2021.1932202
  • Cooper, R. P. (2021). Action production and event perception as routine sequential behaviors. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(1), 63-78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12462

2020

  • Buyakin, E. V., & Cooper, R. P. (2020). Automatic and Controlled Sentence Production: A Computational Model. In S. Denison et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1961-1966). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Toronto, Canada.
  • Caso, A. & Cooper, R. P. (2020). A neurally plausible schema-theoretic approach to modelling cognitive dysfunction and neurophysiological markers in Parkinson’s Disease. Neuropsychologia, 140, 107359. (19 pages.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107359
  • Guest, O., Caso, A. & Cooper, R. P. (2020). On Simulating Neural Damage in Connectionist Networks. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3, 289-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-020-00081-z

2019

  • Cracco, E., & Cooper, R. P. (2019). Automatic Imitation of Multiple Agents: A Computational Model. Cognitive Psychology, 113(101224), 1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101224
  • Yuan, W., Lin, F., & Cooper, R. P. (2019). Relevance theory, pragmatic inference and cognitive architecture. Philosophical Psychology, 32(1), 98-122. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2018.1497788

2018

  • Cooper, R. P., Byde, C., De Cecilio, R., Fulks, C. & Morais, D. S. (2018). Set-shifting and place-keeping as separable control processes. Cognitive Psychology, 105, 53-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.07.001
  • Cooper, R. P. & Peebles, D. (2018). On the relation between Marr’s levels: A response to Blokpoel (2017). Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 649-653. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12283

2017

  • Caso, A. & Cooper, R. P. (2017). A Neurocomputational Model of Learning to Select Actions. In Van Vugt, M., Banks, A., & Kennedy, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling.
  • Caso, A. & Cooper, R. P. (2017). A Model of Cognitive Control in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Integrating Schema Theory and Basal Ganglia Function. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.). Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. pp. 210-215.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2017). Deep-learning networks and the functional architecture of executive control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 33, e261.
  • Sexton, N. J. & Cooper, R. P. (2017). Task inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach. Cognitive Psychology, 94, 1-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003

2016

  • Blakeman, S. & Mareschal, D. (2016) Narrowing of the Cone-of-Direct Gaze Through Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London, UK.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2016). Executive functions and the generation of “random” sequential responses: A computational account. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 73, 153-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.06.002
  • Cooper, R. P. (2016). Schema theory and neuropsychology. In M. A. Arbib and J. J. Bonaiuto (eds.) From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience. (Chapter 14, pp. 433-456.) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Marsh, V. (2016). Set-shifting as a component process of goal-directed problem-solving. Psychological Research, 80(2), 307-323. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0652-2
  • Mareschal, D. & French, R. M. (2016) TRACX2: A connectionist autoencoder using graded chunks to model infant visual statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160057.

2015

  • Cooper, R. P. & Peebles, D. (2015). Beyond single-level accounts: The role of cognitive architectures in cognitive scientific explanation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 243-258. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12132
  • Fautrellle, L., Mareschal, D., French, R. M., Addyman, C. & Thomas, E. (2015) Motor activity improves temporal accuracy. PloS ONE, 10(3): e0119187. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119187
  • Mitsopoulos, C., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2015) Model-based analysis of the Tower of London task, Proceedings of the 2nd Multi-disciplinary Conference in Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making. Edmonton, AL, Canada.
  • Nardini, M, Bales, J. & Mareschal, D. (2015). Integration of audio-visual information for spatial decisions in children and adults. Developmental Science, DOI: 10.1111/desc.12327.
  • Sexton, N. J., & Cooper, R. P. (2015). Task-set inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A computational model of task switching. In R. Dale et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2134-2139). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Pasadena, CA.

2014

  • Addyman, C.Mareschal, D. (2014) GAMIT-Net: Retrospective and prospective interval timing in a single neural network.Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
  • Cooper, R. P., & Guest, O., (2014). Implementations are not specifications: Specification, replication and experimentation in computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 42-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.05.001
  • Cooper, R. P., Ruh, N., & Mareschal, D. (2014). The Goal Circuit Model: A hierarchical multi-route model of the acquisition and control of routine sequential action in humans. Cognitive Science, 38, 244-274. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12067
  • French, R. M., Addyman, C.Mareschal, D. & Thomas, E (2014) Unifying prospective and retrospective interval-time estimation: A fading-Gaussian activation-based model of interval-timing. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 126, 141-150.
  • French, R.M., Addyman, C.Mareschal, D. & Thomas, E. (2014) GAMIT: A Fading-Gaussian Activation Model of Interval-Time  — Unifying prospective and retrospective time estimation Timing & Time Perception Reviews, 1. DOI: 10.1163/24054496-00101002
  • Guest, O., Cooper, R. P., & Davelaar, E., J. (2014). The influence of implementation on “hub” models of semantic cognition. In Mayor, J. & Gomez, P. (Eds.), Computational Models of Cognitive Processes. (pp. 155-169). World Scientific, Singapore.
  • Papera, M., Cooper, R. P., & Richards, A. (2014). Artificially created stimuli produced by a genetic algorithm using a saliency model as its fitness function show that Inattentional Blindness modulates performance in a pop-out visual search paradigm. Vision Research, 97, 31-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.01.013 
  • Sexton, N. J. & Cooper, R. P. (2014). An architecturally constrained model of random number generation and its application to modelling the effect of generation rate. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(160), 1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00670

2013

  • Addyman, C. & Mareschal, D. (2013) Local redundancy governs infants’ spontaneous orienting to visual-temporal sequences. Child Development, 84, 1137-1144.
  • Althaus, N. & Mareschal, D. (2013) Modeling cross-modal interactions in early word learning. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5, 288-297. 
  • Cooper, R. P. (2013). Action slips. In Pashler, H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Mind (pp. 1758-1760). Sage.
  • Cooper, R. P., Catmur, C. & Heyes, C. M. (2013). Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes? Cognitive Science, 37(4), 605-630. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01252.x
  • Cooper, R. P., Cook, R., Dickinson, A., & Heyes, C.M. (2013). Associative (not Hebbian) learning and the mirror neuron system. Neuroscience Letters, 540, 28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.002
  • Fox, J., Cooper, R. P., & Glasspool, D. W. (2013). A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(150), 1-19. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00150
  • Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. (2013). Is there a semantic system for abstract words? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(175), 1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.201300175
  • Sood, M., & Cooper, R. P. (2013). Modelling the Supervisory System and Frontal Dysfunction: An Architecturally Grounded Model of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1354-1359). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Berlin, Germany.
  • Westermann, G. & Mareschal, D. (2013) From perceptual to language-mediated categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369: 201220391

2012

  • Thomas, M. S. C., Purser, H. R. M. & Mareschal, D. (2012) Is the mystery of thought demystified by context-dependent categorisation? Towards a new relation between language and thought. Mind and Language, 27, 595-618. 
  • Althaus, N. & Mareschal, D. (2012) Using saliency maps to separate competing processes in infant visual cognition. Child Development, 83, 1122-1128. 
  • Cooper, R. P. & Davelaar, E. J. (2012). Modelling correlations in “response inhibition”. In E. J. Davelaar (Ed.), Connectionist Models of Neurocognition and Emergent Behaviour (pp. 245-258). World Scientific, Singapore.
  • Cooper, R. P., Wutke, K. & Davelaar, E. (2012). Differential contributions of task-shifting and memory updating to dual task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 587-612. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.629053
  • Cooper, R. P. (2012). Learning action affordances and action schemas. In Seel, N. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1758-1760). Springer, Berlin.
  • Guest, O. & Cooper, R. P. (2012). Semantic cognition: A re-examination of the recurrent network “hub” model. In Rußwinkel, N., Drewitz, U., & van Rijn, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 259-264). Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin.
  • Purser, H., Thomas, M.S.C., Tomlinson, S. & Mareschal, D. (2012) Are imaging and lesioning convergent methods for assessing functional specialisation? Investigations using an artificial neural network. Brain and Cognition, 78, 38-49.
  • Shallice, T. & Cooper, R. P. (2012). The Organisation of Mind: Response to commentators. Cortex, 48, 1383-1387. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.07.004

2011

  • Addyman, C., French, R. M., Mareschal, D. & Thomas, E. (2011). Learning to perceive time: A connectionist, memory-decay model of the development of interval timing in infants In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA: USA.  
  • Cooper, R. P. (2011). Cognitive control in the generation of random sequences: A computational study of secondary task effects. In Hoelscher, C., Shipley, T.F., and Carlson, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2168-2173). Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Boston, MA.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2011). Complementary perspectives on cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 208-211. DOI: 10.1111/j.756-8765.2011.01145.x
  • Cooper, R. P. & Shallice, T. (2011). The roles of functional neuroimaging and cognitive neuropsychology in the development of cognitive theory: A reply to Coltheart. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28(6), 403-413.
  • French, R. M., Addyman, C.Mareschal, D. (2011): TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction. Psychological Review, 118, 614-636.

2010

  • Cooper, R. P. (2010): Cognitive control: Componential or emergent? Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 598-613.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Davelaar, E. J. (2010): Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: A simulation approach. In Salvucci, D. & Gunzelmann, G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Cognitive Modelling. pp. 31-36. Drexel University: Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Davelaar, E. J. & Cooper, R. P. (2010): Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: An analytic approach. In Catrambone, R. & Ohlsson, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 937-942. Cognitive Science Society Incorporated: Portland, OR, USA.
  • Mareschal, D. (2010) Computational perspectives on cognitive development. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review.
  • Mareschal, D., Quinn, P. C. & Lea, S. E. G. (Eds.) (2010) The making of human concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2010): Action selection in complex routinized sequential behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 955-975.
  • Thomas, R., Nardini, M. & Mareschal, D. (2010). Interactions between “light-from-above” and convexity priors in visual development. Journal of Vision, 10(8):6, 1-7.

2009

  • Cooper, R. P. (2009): Extending the contention scheduling model of routine action selection: The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task and frontal dysfunction. In Howes, A., Peebles, D., & Cooper, R. P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Manchester, UK. pp. 198-203. April.
  • Howes, A., Peebles, D., & Cooper, R. P. (eds.) (2009): Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Manchester, UK.
  • Mareschal, D., Leech, R., & Cooper, R. P. (2009): Connectionist and Dynamic Systems models of development: The case of analogical completion. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M. S. C., & McClelland, J. L. (eds.), Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Re-Considered. pp. 203-217. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
  • Purser, H., Thomas, M. S. C., & Snoxall, S. & Mareschal, D. (2009) The development of similarity: Testing the prediction of a computational model of metaphor comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1406-1430.

2008

  • Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2008): Analogy as Relational Priming: A Developmental and Computational Perspective on the Origins of a Complex Cognitive Skill. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 357-378.
  • Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2008): Response to commentators: Growing cognition from recycled parts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 401-414.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2008): The hierarchies and systems that underlie routine behavior: evidence from an experiment in virtual gardening. In Sloutsky, V., Love, B., & McRae, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC. pp. 339-344. July.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2008): A connectionist approach to modelling the flexible control of routine activities. In French, R. M. & Thomas, E. (eds.), From Rules to Associations: Connectionist Models of Behaviour and Cognition. pp. 3-15. World Scientific: Singapore. PDF
  • Sirois, S., Spratling, M.W., Thomas, M.S.C., Westermann, G., Mareschal, D., and Johnson, M.H. (2008) Precis of Neuroconstructivism: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31, 321-356

2007

2006

  • Baughman, F. D. & Cooper, R. P. (2006): Inhibition and young children’s performance on the Tower of London task. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Trieste, Italy. pp. 26-31. April.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2006): Cognitive Architectures as Lakatosian Research Programmes: Two case studies. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 199-220.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Shallice, T. (2006): Structured representations in the control of behavior cannot be so easily dismissed: A reply to Botvinick and Plaut (2006). Psychological Review, 113, 929-931.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Shallice, T. (2006): Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behaviour. Psychological Review, 113, 887-916.
  • Crescentini, C., Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. (2006): A macroplanning model to simulate dynamic aphasia. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Trieste, Italy. pp. 80-85. April.
  • Grecucci, A., Cooper, R. P., & Rumiati, R. I. (2006): The emotional enhancement of stimulus-response compatibility: A computational study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Trieste, Italy. pp. 118-123. April.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2006): Redundancy and multiple levels of control in a connectionist model of sequential action. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Trieste, Italy. pp. 262-267. April.
  • Westermann, G., Sirois, S., Shultz, T.R. & Mareschal, D. (2006). Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 227-232.

2005

  • Cooper, R. P. (2005): The control of routine action: Modelling normal and impaired functioning. In Houghton, G. (eds.), Connectionist models in Cognitive Psychology. pp. 313-344. Psychology Press: Hove, UK.
  • Cooper, R. P., Schwartz, M. F., Yule, P., & Shallice, T. (2005): The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 959-1004.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2005): Routine action: Combining familiarity and goal orientedness. In Bryson, J. J., Prescott, T. J., & Seth, A. K. (eds.), Modelling Natural Action Selection. Edinburgh. pp. 174-179.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2005): The time course of routine action. In Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L., & Bucciarelli, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Stresa, Italy. pp. 1889-1894. July.
  • Ruh, N., Cooper, R. P., & Mareschal, D. (2005): A reinforcement model of sequential routine action. In Honkela, T., Köhönen, V., Pöllä, M., & Simula, O. (eds.), Proceedings of International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Espoo, Finland. pp. 65-70. June.
  • Westermann, G. & Mareschal, D. (2005). Connectionist modelling. In Hopkins, B., Barr, R. G., Michel, G. F., & Rochat, P. (Eds.) Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Child Development. 305-308. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2004

  • Leech, R. & Mareschal, D. (2004): Connectionist modelling of the development of analogical completion. AISB Quarterly Newsletter, 18, 4-5.
  • Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2004): A temporal attractor framework for the development of analogical completion. In Bowman, H. & Labiouse, C. (eds.), Connectionist Models of Cognition and Perception II. pp. 201-210. World Scientific: Singapore.
  • Sirois, S. & Mareschal, D. (2004): An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16, 1352-1362.
  • Westermann, G. &, Mareschal, D. (2004): Modelling asymmetric infant categorization with the representational acuity hypothesis. In Howe, P. & Labouise, C. (Eds.) Connectionist models of cognition and perception II: Proceedings of the Eighth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW8). 95-104. London, UK: World Scientific.

2003

  • Cooper, R. P. (2003): Organisation and disorganisation of complex sequential activities. In Detje, F., Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Bamberg, Deutschland. pp. 51-56. April.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2003): Mechanisms for the generation and regulation of sequential behaviour. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 389-416.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Yule, P. (2003): An introduction to the COGENT cognitive modelling environment. In Detje, F., Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Bamberg, Deutschland. pp. 315. April.
  • Cooper, R. P., Yule, P., & Fox, J. (2003): Cue selection and category learning: A systematic comparison of three theories. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3, 143-182.
  • Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. P. (2003): A connectionist account of analogical development. In Alterman, R. & Kirsh, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA. pp. 710-715. August.
  • Mareschal, D. (2003). Connectionist models of learning and development in infancy. In Quinlan, P. (Ed.), Connectionist Models of Development. 43-82. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Mareschal, D. (2003). Computational Models of Cognitive Development. In Nadel, L. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Cognitive Science. 533-39.  London, UK: Macmillan.
  • Yule, P. & Cooper, R. P. (2003): Express: A web-based technology to support human and computational experimentation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 605-613.

2002

  • Cooper, R. P. (2002): Two closely related simulations provide weak limits on Residual Normality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 754-755.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2002): Order and disorder in everyday action: The roles of contention scheduling and supervisory attention. Neurocase, 8, 61-79.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2002): Control and communication in mental computation. Computational Intelligence, 18, 29-31.
  • Cooper, R. P. (2002): Modelling High-Level Cognitive Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
  • French, R. M., Mermillod, M., Chauvin, A., Quinn, P.C., & Mareschal, D. (2002).  The importance of starting blurry: Simulating improved basic-level category learning in infants due to weak visual acuity. In Proceedings of the twenty -fourth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London: LEA.
  • Mareschal, D. (2002). Connectionist methods in infancy research. In Fagen, J. & Hayne, H. (Eds.), Progress in Infancy Research, Vol. 2. 71-119. Erlbaum. (Formerly Advances in Infancy Research).
  • Mareschal, D. & Johnson, S. P. (2002) Learning to perceive object unity: A connectionist account. Developmental Science 5, 151-172.
  • Sirois, S. & Mareschal, D. (2002) Models of infant habituation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 293-98.
  • Sirois, S. & Mareschal, D. (2002). Infant habituation: a review of current computational models and a new proposal.  In Bullinaria, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW7). 51-63. London, UK: World Scientific Press.

2001

  • Cooper, R. P. (2001): The role of object-oriented concepts in cognitive models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 333.
  • Cooper, R. P. & Glasspool, D. W. (2001): Learning action affordances and action schemas. In French, R. M. & Sougné, J. (eds.), Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution. pp. 133-142. Springer-Verlag: London.
  • French, R. M., Mermillod, M., Quinn, P.C., Mareschal, D. (2001). Reversing category exclusivities in infant perceptual categorisation: Simulation and data. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 307-312. London: LEA.
  • Schafer, G. & Mareschal, D. (2001). Modeling infant speech sound discrimination using simple associative networks. Infancy 2, 7-28.
  • Thomas, M. S. C. & Mareschal, D. (2001) Metaphor as categorisation: A connectionist implementation. Metaphor and Symbol 16, 5-27.
  • Thomas, M. S. C., Mareschal, D., & Hinds, A. C. (2001), A connectionist account of the emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1042-1047. London: LEA.
  • Yule, P. & Cooper, R. P. (2001): Towards a technology for computational experimentation. In Altmann, E., Cleeremans, A., Schunn, C. D., & Gray, W. D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling. Fairfax, VA. pp. 223-228. July.

2000

  • Cooper, R. P. & Shallice, T. (2000): Contention Scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297-338. PDF
  • Mareschal, D. (2000). Connectionist modelling and infant development. In Muir, D. and Slater, A.M. (Eds). Essential Readings in Psychology: Infant Development. 55-65. Oxford and Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Mareschal, D., French, R. M., Quinn, P. (2000). A connectionist account of asymmetric category learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology 36, 635-645.
Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory
Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.